survival horror

by Caitlyn Wilson for Unsplash
content notes: stalking; coercion, unwanted contact, attrition
āIām going to call this what it is, which is stalking,ā I told my best friend.
Iād described it from the top. It had been going on far too long, and itād pushed me well beyond my capacity. She admitted she was scared now, too.
āBut here is what is bothering me, because I donāt understand it,ā I said. āIāve had a lot of stalkers?ā I was trembling. What must be wrong with me?
It had started in high school, with a girl.
āI donāt know that name,ā my best friend said.
āYou wouldnāt,ā I said. Sheād attended C.H.S., a town over. We met through speech and debate. āShe gave me my moonstone necklace,ā I confessed. āI should not have accepted it.ā We hung out once, awkwardly; it wasnāt the same as hanging out with other teens in a group. After that, she knew the way to my house, had her own car, started showing up. Long drive. No advance notice. I think I was a year younger. I was becoming afraid of this; I hid in my bedroom.
M.D. had approached me at a local tournament. āL isnāt here,ā sheād said, ābut she asked me to give you this.ā It looked like a note, folded into a tight tidy square.
I unfolded it. It was a love poem, written in a careful scrawl with no mistakes, no scratchouts or scribbles or Wite-Out. I read the first two lines: You made me love you, you bitch / You made me want you, you whore
I quickly folded it back up.
āDid you read this?ā I asked M.D.
She said she hadnāt.
āCan I ask you,ā I said, āis L a lesbian?ā
āNo,ā M.D. said. She hesitated, shifting her weight from one foot to the other. āI think she likes both,ā she finally said.
This was the ā90s, and we were children. We did not have the words.
āThat is traumatic,ā my best friend exclaimed.
āIāve never told anyone because I felt so ashamed,ā I said.
āAnd then there was your boyfriend!ā She was outraged now.
Iād tried to break up with him repeatedly. Instead, heād cried on the stoop, had refused to leave no matter how many times my parent had confronted him, had crept around the house and rapped on my bedroom window at night. It wasnāt romantic; itād given me nightmares. I still have nightmares about my childhood bedroom, about a shadowy figure darkening the windows, rattling at them to get in. His best friendāmy boyfriendās own best friend!āhad gotten a job on my universityās campus just so he could try finding me at my dorm a few times a week. I was mortified. Had I misled him in some way? Realizing Iād never fully understood this person or his intentions at all, Iād made myself scarce. After that, the boyfriendās friend had become retaliatory.
Soon after college, there was a close friend. In another life, heād been a missionary. Now I was the mission, the recipient of a hard sell. Iād eventually yielded. Yep! Now he was pacing around outside my retail job. I wasnāt going to make a scene at work. Outside of work, though, Iād tried to reason with him. Finally, just as gently as I couldāwhich was very gently, for 2005āIād asked him if heād ever considered he might be autistic. āBecause I keep trying to explain,ā I said to him, ābut maybe Iām being too subtle or not literal enough, because you donāt seem to understand.ā
āIām not autistic,ā he eventually told me. āI understand you. Iām just acting like I donāt because itās not what I want to hear1.ā We didnāt know the word āboundariesā in the early-to-mid 2000s. Also, the word we were tossing around was actually āAspergerās,ā because, again, the language has since changed. It was a devastating way for a friendship to end.
I recounted all this to my best friend. She reminded me that my next boyfriend had followed me halfway across the USA. Yes, and heād found a novel way to get us back together: by terrorizing the guy Iād started seeing right after him. Wanting no drama, Iād taken the path of least resistance.
I hadnāt even remembered the realtor, whoād taken me around apartments until Iād found a charming brownstone, whoād started phoning to try to set up a casual dateāwhile I was at workāoften. (āIām at work!ā I hissed. āAnswer me when I call you,ā he snapped back.) I was horrified. I was scared to move into my new apartment, had trembled in my friendās apartment. āWhat if he has his own set of keys?ā I asked her in a full panic.
Now it was coming to a head. As a freelance writer, thereās no such thing as āunwantedā attention, right? You should be happy for the cross-platform āengagementā in your DMs? Trying to pick and choose which people and interactions you want to prioritize is entitled and unfair of you? Youāre literally out here asking for it? Maybe youāre not cut out for retail, for a workplace with a big picture window where a wall should be.
I think there might be people who, understandably, very relatably, become obsessed with the feeling of being seen and perceivedāwho decide they want a captive audience to clap and cheer, thatās really allābut itās starting to remind me of that creepypasta or urban legend, the one that ends with a ghost or killer shouting āso you can see me!ā
Or what if itās so much more punitive than that: āI have now perceived you, when you shouldāve been making yourself so much more invisible, you silly goose, and I canāt wait to punish you for this transgression of visibility.ā
āWhat does it all mean,ā I said, slumping against the counter, gripping it to hold my body up. āHow do you say no to someone you canāt say no to?ā Then I folded, dropping my elbows onto the counter, my face in my hands. āWhat is the lesson?ā I asked helplessly.
I stood there like that, propped up by the kitchen counter for at least a minute, silent, wracking my brain.
āThe intrusiveness,ā I said, āthen the olā wear-em-down. Thatās the whole strategy.ā I uncovered my face and laughed ruefully. Thatās what weāve romanticized, right? The pursuit? That itās supposed to be flattering? That every āno, please stopā or āplease, Iām at workā brings the pursuer one ānoā closer to a maybe?
āItās stalking lite,ā I realized aloud. Diet stalking. āIt keeps happening because I keep staying saying no.ā My best friend blinked. āOne no is enough,ā I clarified. One āstop itā ought to do the job. This isnāt a negotiation of territory; this isnāt a compromise. Itās what my 12-year-old frenemy had tried to get me to understand: that my pleading to be left alone was my whole problem. God, it was so simple.
My thoughts flickered to the zombie horror genre. I get stressed out watching zombies, I completely avoid the genre, cannot get through a full movie in one sitting. It makes survival horror games hard to play. Because thereās nothing scarier than a person who cannot be reasoned with, who just keeps coming at you.
Iād had an intrusive parent. With boundaries a constant ongoing negotiation, it was always going to be a test of emotional endurance until one of us flatlined.
Well, it sure means Iāll never chase anyone down again, eitherāwith apologies to my first-grade crush, a distinctly, comically one-sided affection. Sorry, Mark M.
Hereās something horrifying I recently learned: New research shows that many obsessive people, the types who become stalkersāthe ultimate reply-guys, parasocial times a billionāgenuinely believe everything is for them, believe that the object of their affection/hatred is subliminally writing, posting, or otherwise behaving, for them specifically.
This left me thinking about pareidolia: how, in the absence of complete data, we fill in the gaps, quite literally attempting to project a true picture, using our own brain A.I. to convert an image into 4K. Making a complete picture is high-level cognitive functioning; if youāve ever been on psychedelics, youāve seen a face flicker and melt, and you know it looks the stuff early A.I. generated, with dogs and eyeballs everywhere, lookinā like a Biblically-accurate 5D seraphim. Itās a literal hallucination, a failure to predict and fill what goes into visual gaps correctly. (I have, as a peculiar product of hearing damage, āmusical ear syndrome,ā a type of pareidolia where I inexplicably hear angelic music, the most gorgeous thing I ever heard, inside of white noise, but only when I am very incredibly tired.)
When we fill in the informational gaps with our own hopes or fears, it can become a little schizoid, a little ādelulu,ā can become limerenceāfantastical idealization, based on oneās own piecemeal construction of an ideal personāwhich can quickly, darkly turn into whatever the opposite of limerence is. If the real-life object disappoints, if they donāt perfectly align with the idealized internal object, they are converted into a ābad internal object.ā This means the object is denigrated, and now assumes, for the obsessive person, the voice of an introjectāan evil, hypercritical voice coming from inside, from the obsessiveās own mind, a type of bad programmingāwhile continuing to wear the face of the object of affection/contempt. If that sounds like it veers toward psychosis, well, youād be correct. Itās like an inner demon wearing someone elseās face. That is too much for the object/target, who is a real human in real life, to be up against. That is why stalking is so frightening.
But then I started thinking about all the times we have incomplete data and, given to pareidolia, we fill in the gaps and are absolutely correct, permitted that all cognitive resources are freed up for it and allocated to it. This looks like a sort of supernatural intuition, when it is really more like a sort of high-level multifactor pattern recognition.
I was thinking about this because Iām better than most at lipreading, maybe jarringly so. Well, it requires a certain attunement to the subject. But one evening Iād briefly lost the ability to lipread after drinking a single Pabst tallboy. It was then that I realized that, all along, Iād been filling in data gaps without consciously noticing, and that drinking a beer throws me out of attunement entirely. Which is why drinking a beer feels great, socially, when you tend toward over-attunement and over-functioning, but itās absolutely disastrous when youāre the only one in the room who can ordinarily read lips.
Perhaps what over-empathy is, then, is using ourselves to fill in the informational gaps: an overextension, a hyperextension, producing microtears in the ligaments and tissues and joints, a movement beyond what is considered normal range, which isnāt really noticeable or observableārather, it is taken for grantedāuntil there is severe injury, or maybe some accumulation of catastrophic damage to the self, like being told you need a left hip replacement at age 40 because the damage is beyond reparable.
This is really a footnote, though, about denial, about people who throw out information because they just donāt like the information: a manufactured delusion because we have issues with cognitive dissonance, even when that dissonance is entirely internally produced. So when you tell someone ānoā and they ignore you, they are potentially creating their own data gap, filling in your ānoā with their hopeful or angry āmaybeā. When you give them even more informationāmaybe an accidental firehosing, rather than clarityāyou are offering up more material for them to punch holes into, to manufacture their own picture.
This gives me pause, because I have to now consider all the times people told me to my face how they felt about something, and I thought to myself āwell, that canāt be right, because a normal, healthy person would never say that.ā Yeah, well.↩